Welcome to hypercone.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Minkowski functional

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In functional analysis, given a linear space X, a Minkowski functional is a device that uses the linear structure to introduce a topology on X.

Contents

[edit] Motivation

[edit] Example 1

Consider a normed vector space X, with the norm ||·||. Let K be the unit sphere in X. Define a function p : X → R by

p(x) = \inf \left\{r > 0: x \in r K \right\}.

One can see that p(x) = \|x\|, i.e. p is just the norm on X. The function p is a special case of a Minkowski functional.

[edit] Example 2

Let X be a vector space without topology with underlying scalar field K. Take φ ∈ X' , the algebraic dual of X, i.e. φ : X → K is a linear functional on X. Fix a > 0. Let the set K be given by

K = \{ x \in X : | \phi(x) | \leq a \}.

Again we define

p(x) = \inf \left\{r > 0: x \in r K \right\}.

Then

p(x) = \frac{1}{a} \| \phi(x) \|.

The function p(x) is another instance of a Minkowski functional. It has the following properties:

  1. It is subadditive: p(x + y) ≤ p(x) + p(y),
  2. It is homogeneous: for all αK, p(α x) = |α| p(x),
  3. It is nonnegative.

Therefore p is a seminorm on X, with an induced topology. This is characteristic of Minkowski functionals defined via "nice" sets. There's a one-to-one correspondence between seminorms and the Minkowski functional given by such sets. What is meant precisely by "nice" is discussed in the section below.

Notice that, in contrast to a stronger requirement for a norm, p(x) = 0 need not imply x = 0. In the above example, one can take a nonzero x from the kernel of φ. Consequently, the resulting topology need not be Hausdorff.

[edit] Definition

The above examples suggest that, given a (complex or real) vector space X and a subset K, one can define a corresponding Minkowski functional

p_K:X \rightarrow [0, \infty)

by

p_K (x) = \inf \left\{r > 0: x \in r K \right\}.

It is implicitly assumed in this definition that 0 ∈ K and the set {r > 0: xr K} is nonempty. In order for pK to have the properties of a seminorm, additional restrictions must be imposed on K. These conditions are listed below.

  1. The set K being convex implies the subadditivity of pK.
  2. Homogeneity, i.e. pK(α x) = |α| pK(x) for all α, is ensured if K is balanced, meaning α KK for all |α| ≤ 1.

[edit] Convexity of K

A simple geometric argument that shows convexity of K implies subadditivity is as follows. Suppose for the moment that pK(x) = pK(y) = r. Then for all ε > 0, we have x, y ∈ (r + ε) K = K' . The assumption that K is convex means K' is also. Therefore ½ x + ½ y is in K' . By definition of the Minkowski functional pK, one has

p_K\left( \frac{1}{2} x + \frac{1}{2} y\right) \le r + \epsilon = \frac{1}{2} p_K(x) + \frac{1}{2} p_K(y) + \epsilon .

But the left hand side is ½ pK(x + y), i.e. the above becomes

p_K(x + y) \le  p_K(x) + p_K(y) + \epsilon, \quad \mbox{for all} \quad \epsilon > 0.

This is the desired inequality. The general case pK(x) > pK(y) is obtained after the obvious modification.

Note Convexity of K, together with the initial assumption that the set {r > 0: xr K} is nonempty, implies that K is absorbent.

[edit] Balancedness of K

Notice that K being balanced implies that

\lambda x \in r K \quad \mbox{if and only if} \quad x \in \frac{r}{|\lambda|} K.

Therefore

p_K (\lambda x) = \inf \left\{r > 0:  \lambda x \in r K \right\} 
=  \inf \left\{r > 0:  x \in \frac{r}{|\lambda|} K \right\}
= \inf \left\{ | \lambda | \frac{r}{ | \lambda | } > 0:  x \in \frac{r}{|\lambda|} K \right\}
= |\lambda| p_K(x).

[edit] Related links

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs