Welcome to hypercone.com on July 6 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Private member's bill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Private Member's Bill)
Jump to: navigation, search

A private member's bill or (member of parliament’s) legislative motion is a bill (a proposed law) introduced by a backbencher, a so-called private member of parliament, who can be a member of a party represented in the government or in the opposition. It can also be introduced by a crossbencher (this is more common in Federal and State Australian parliaments, where crossbenchers are more numerous than in British Parliament). In most parliaments within the Westminster System of parliamentary democracy, the overwhelming majority of bills introduced are proposed by members of the cabinet. However, some parliamentary time is regularly set aside so that backbenchers and crossbenchers may also introduce bills. Note that a private member's bill should not be confused with a private bill. Private members' bills are in fact public bills. In Australia, a draft bill is prepared by Parliamentary Counsel, acting under instructions from the private member. After community consultation, the member introduces the bill into the Parliament.

Only a small proportion of private members' bills make it to enactment. This is generally because of lack of time - a controversial private member's bill can be "talked out". In some cases, measures that a government does not want to take responsibility for may be introduced by backbenchers, with the government secretly or openly backing the measure and ensuring its passage. They are sometimes known as "handout" or "whips' bills". The Abortion Act 1967 was enacted in the United Kingdom through this means, with the Bill itself being introduced by a Liberal Party Member of Parliament, David Steel; through the support from Home Secretary Roy Jenkins the Bill was given enough government time to allow a full debate.

Other private member's bills to have been enacted include the Adoption Act 1964, the Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1964, the Charter Trustees Act 1986, the Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act 1996, the Knives Act 1997, the British Nationality (Hong Kong) Act 1997, the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003, the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004, the Sustainable Communities Act 2006.

The United Kingdom parliament has a long history of enacting private member's bills. In contrast, Ireland's parliament, the Oireachtas Éireann, rarely passes private members' bills, with the overwhelming number of bills being passed all being introduced by members of the Irish government.[citation needed]

Contents

[edit] Private member's bills in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom House of Commons, there are several routes to introducing private members' bills. In each session, twenty backbench MPs are selected by ballot to introduce a bill. These bills are given priority for debate and generally offer the best chance of success. Additional bills may be introduced via the Ten Minute Rule, although this is usually used just to raise an issue rather than legislate on it, or through presentation without debate under Standing Order 57. Neither Ten Minute Rule or presentation bills are likely to get time to be debated, so only non-controversial bills have any chance of success. Private members' bills from the Lords may also be adopted by an MP to complete their journey through Parliament.

Private member's bills can sometimes become the cause for much anxiety and shenanigans as outside individuals or organisations seek to influence members who have been selected in the ballot.

There are two principal routes for influencing UK law:

  • Lobbying a government department or minister.
  • Lobbying a member of parliament who has a private member's bill coming up.

[edit] British House of Commons procedure

In principle, private members' bills follow much the same parliamentary stages as any other bill. In practice, the procedural barriers to passage are much greater.

Time is allocated for private members' bills on 13 Fridays a year in the House of Commons. Five hours of time are available each day, and several private members' bills are scheduled for each session.

Unlike Government bills, debates are not timetabled and there is no guarantee that the debate will finish within the time available. MPs opposed to a private member's bill, including Government ministers and whips, will routinely attempt to talk out the bill, stopping further progress by preventing a vote. The bill's proponent can force a vote only with the support of at least a hundred members (and a majority of those voting)[1]. As many MPs return to their constituencies on Thursday night, this has the practical effect of blocking all private members' bills without solid support.

It is quite possible for the first bill to take up all five hours, preventing any other bill on the agenda from being debated. Any bill not debated may receive second reading without debate at the end of the session, but a single shout of "object!" will delay consideration to a future date; Government and opposition whips routinely block contentious private members' bills in this way. Another date for second reading will also be set for bills which have been talked out. This is a formality; the bill will be put to the bottom of the order paper, will likely be objected to on each future occasion and has no practical chance of success.

Even if second reading is passed, a bill is likely to need the support of the government to become law. The bill will be referred to standing committee, which may make amendments. The amended version of the bill will then return to the Commons. To become law, it must also successfully negotiate report stage and third reading, as well as the House of Lords. Contentious bills are likely to run out of parliamentary time unless the government allocates some; any pending private members' bills lapse at the end of each parliamentary session.

Private members' bills may also originate in the House of Lords. To become law, these bills must be adopted by an MP and passed in the same way as a Commons originated bill.

[edit] Private member's bills in the Australian Parliament

Only 15 private member's bills or private senator's bills introduced into the Australian Parliament since 1901 have been passed into law[1]. Of these, eight have been initiated by senators and seven by members. A larger number have passed one house but not the other. An even larger number did not pass the house in which they were introduced and thus lapsed.

Among the most notable of the successful bills was the Commonwealth Electoral Bill 1924, which introduced compulsory voting for federal elections. This was introduced by Senator for Tasmania Herbert Payne of the Nationalist Party[2] on 16 July 1924, passed by the Senate on 23 July, passed by the House of Representatives on 24 July - both times with little debate - and given Royal Assent on 31 July. Despite much public debate ever since on the issue of compulsory voting, the legislation has never been repealed.

Another very notable private member's bill was the Euthanasia Laws Bill 1996, which deprived the Northern Territory, Australian Capital Territory and Norfolk Island legislatures of the power to make laws permitting euthanasia. This was introduced by Kevin Andrews, Member for Menzies, after the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly had passed such a law, the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995. Although Andrews was a member of the Liberal Party, members and senators were allowed a conscience vote on the issue, and each side of the debate was supported by members and senators from all political parties.

Notable also was the private member's bill introduced by The Hon. Alan Corbett MLC of the NSW Legislative Council to amend the Crimes Act of 1900. The first successfully enacted (or indeed introduced) bill in over 100 years to address the protection of children from abuse and excessive physical chastisement. It received very wide support from New South Wales organisations related to child health and welfare and was backed by several prominent members of the medical profession, particularly in the paediatric field, notably Dr. John Yu, CEO of Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney (who had been honoured by the Australian Government with the prestigious Australian of the Year award in 1996). Its initial aims were to limit physical chastisement by banning the use of implements (belts, sticks, hairbrushes etc.), ban the use of force above the shoulders (thus preventing neck, head, brain and facial injuries), and require that any physical force applied leave only trivial and short-lived signs such as redness (i.e. no bruising, swelling, welts, cuts, grazes, internal injuries, emotional trauma etc.). With the exception of the clause banning the use of implements (which was dropped to gain essential support from the state Labor Government for the bill), it was passed intact and became law in 2001.

[edit] Private members bills in Canadian Parliament

In Canada, a private member's bill is a bill introduced in the House of Commons by a member of parliament who is not a cabinet minister. A private member's bill follows the same legislative process as a government bill, but the time allocated for its consideration is restricted. Very few private member's bills become law. Under rules established in 1986, 20 items of private members' business are selected at random to receive priority in debate. Six of these items are chosen by a committee to be votable and must come to a vote in the House. Under the old rules, private members' bills and motions were "talked out" with almost no prospect of being passed. Private Members' Bills may be considered only during Private Members' Hour
Notable private members bills have been:

  • The "Unborn Victims of Crime Act" (C-484), a fetal homicide proposal passed a Second Reading in Parliament on March 5 2008. This bill would have amended the Criminal Code to allow separate homicide charges to be laid in the death of a fetus when a pregnant woman is attacked.
  • Winnipeg NDP MP Pat Martin proposed a bill in the House of Commons, culminating a campaign he has been organizing to have hydrogenated vegetable oil, eliminated from the Canadian food system.[2]
  • Bill C-531 entitled An Act to amend the Currency Act and the Royal Canadian Mint Act (abolition of the cent). This Bill aims to stop the production of the penny, phase it out of circulation, and introduce a ‘rounding’ system to adjust prices to the nearest nickel.[3]
  • A net neutrality bill was proposed by Charlie Angus in May 2008[4]

[edit] References

[edit] External links

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs