Relative homology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In algebraic topology, a branch of mathematics, the (singular) homology of a topological space relative to a subspace is a construction in singular homology, for pairs of spaces. The relative homology is useful and important in several ways. Intuitively, it helps determine what part of an absolute homology group comes from which subspace.

[edit] Definition

Given a subspace $A\subset X$ , one may form the short exact sequence

$0\to C_\bullet(A) \to C_\bullet(X)\to C_\bullet(X) /C_\bullet(A) \to 0$

where $C_\bullet(X)$ denotes the singular chains on the space X. The boundary map on $C_\bullet(X)$ leaves $C_\bullet(A)$ invariant and therefore descends to a boundary map on the quotient. The correponding homology is called relative homology:

$H_n(X,A) = H_n (C_\bullet(X) /C_\bullet(A)).$

One says that relative homology is given by the relative cycles, chains whose boundaries are chains on A, modulo the relative boundaries (chains that are homologous to a chain on A, i.e. chains that would be boundaries, modulo A again).

[edit] Properties

The above short exact sequences specifying the relative chain groups gives rise to a chain complex of short exact sequences. An application of the snake lemma then yields a long exact sequence

$\cdots \to H_n(A) \to H_n(X) \to H_n (X,A) \stackrel{\delta}{\to} H_{n-1}(A) \to \cdots .$

The connecting map δ takes a relative cycle, representing a homology class in H_n(X, A), to its boundary (which is a chain in A).

It follows that H_n(X, x₀), where x₀ is a point in X, is the n-th reduced homology group of X. In other words, H_i(X, x₀) = H_i(X) for all i > 0. When i = 0, H₀(X, x₀) is the free module of one rank less than H₀(X). The connected component containing x₀ becomes trivial in relative homoloy.

The excision theorem says that removing a sufficiently nice subset Z ⊂ A leaves the relative homology groups H_n(X, A) unchanged. Using the long exact sequence of pairs and the excision theorem, one can show that H_n(X, A) is the same as the n-th reduced homology groups of the quotient space X/A.

The n-th local homology group of a space X at a point x₀ is defined to be H_n(X, X - x₀). Informally, this is the "local" homology of X close to x₀.

Relative homology readily extends to the triple (X, Y, Z) for Z ⊂ Y ⊂ X.

One can define the Euler characteristic for a pair Y ⊂ X by

$\chi (X, Y) = \sum _0 ^n (-1)^j \; \mbox{rank} \; H_j (X, Y).$

The exactness of the sequence implies that the Euler characteristic is additive, i.e. if Z ⊂ Y ⊂ X, one has

$\chi (X, Z) = \chi (X, Y) + \chi (Y, Z).\,$

[edit] Functoriality

The map $C_\bullet$ can be considered to be a functor

$C_\bullet:\bold{Top}^2\to\bold{Comp}$

where Top² is the category of pairs of topological spaces and Comp is the category of chain complexes.

[edit] Examples

One important use of relative homology is the computation of the homology groups of quotient spaces $X / A$ . In the case that $A$ is a subspace of $X$ such that there exists a neighborhood of $X$ that has $A$ as a deformation retract, the group $H n (X / A)$ is isomorphic to $H n (X, A)$ . We can immediately use this fact to compute the homology of a sphere. We can realize $S n$ as the quotient of a n-disk by its boundary, ie $S n = D n / S n - 1$ . Applying the exact sequence of relative homology gives the following:
$...H_n(D^n)\rightarrow H_n(D^n,S^{n-1})\rightarrow H_{n-1}(S^{n-1})\rightarrow H_{n-1}(D^n)...$

Because the disk is contractable, we know its homology groups vanish in all dimensions, so the above sequence collapses to the short exact sequence:

$0\rightarrow H_n(D^n,S^{n-1}) \rightarrow H_{n-1}(S^{n-1}) \rightarrow 0$

Therefore, we get isomorphisms $H_n(D^n,S^{n-1})\cong H_{n-1}(S^{n-1})$ . We can now proceed by induction to show that $H_n(D^n,S^{n-1})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ . Now because $S n - 1$ is the deformation retract of a suitable neighborhood of $D n$ , we get that $H_n(D^n,S^{n-1})\cong H_n(S^n)\cong \mathbb{Z}$