Welcome to hypercone.com on July 9 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Republic of Austria v. Altmann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Republic of Austria v. Altmann

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 24, 2004
Decided June 7, 2004
Full case name Republic of Austria et al. v. Altmann
Citations 541 U.S. 677 (more)
Holding
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies retroactively.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Stevens, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concurrence Scalia
Concurrence Breyer, joined by Souter
Dissent Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas

Republic of Austria v. Altmann, 541 U.S. 677 (2004),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act applies retroactively. It is one of the most recent cases that deals with the "Anti Retroactivity Doctrine", which is a doctrine that holds that courts should not construe a statute to apply retroactively (to apply to situations that arose before it was enacted) unless there is a clear statutory intent that it would do so. This means that, regarding lawsuits filed after its enactment, the FSIA standards of sovereign immunity and its exceptions apply even to conduct that took place before 1976.

The result of this for the plaintiff, Maria Altmann, was that she could bring an action against Austria for recovery of a painting stolen by the Nazis and now housed in a government museum. Both parties agreed to arbitration in an Austrian court in 2005. The court ruled in favor of Altmann on 16 January 2006.

Contents

[edit] Case

Adele Bloch-Bauer, the subject of two of the paintings, had written in her last will: "Meine 2 Porträts und 4 Landschaften von Gustav Klimt, bitte ich meinen Ehegatten nach seinem Tode der österr. Staats-Galerie in Wien zu hinterlassen" - I ask my husband to bequeath my 2 portraits and the 4 landscapes by Gustav Klimt to the Austrian state gallery in Vienna after his death. Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer signed a statement acknowledging Adele's wish in her last will. He also donated one of the paintings to Belvedere Gallery in Vienna in 1936. [2] However, in a controversial ruling, the Austrian Supreme Court determined that Adele was probably never the legal owner of the paintings. Rather, it viewed it as more likely that Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer was their legal owner and that in turn Altmann was the rightful heir of Ferdinand's estate.

Poster in Vienna, bidding goodbye to the painting Adele Bloch-Bauer.

The ruling in favor of Maria Altmann came as a great shock to the Austrian public and the government. The loss of the paintings was regarded in Austria as a loss of national treasure. The Austrian government received wide criticism from the opposition parties for its failure to secure a deal with Maria Altmann at an earlier stage. Maria Altmann told the government that the time was up and there would be no deal from her side anymore. She had attempted earlier to come to some mutual agreement in the 1990s, however the government kept on ignoring her offers and her letter. The Austrian government declined to accept a condition of the arbitration which would have allowed it preferentially to purchase the paintings at an attested market price. The paintings left Austria in March 2006 and were flown to Los Angeles. There were various attempts by Austrians to buy at least some of the works back.

Just months after the Austrian Government finally returned Ms. Altmann's family's heirlooms to her, she consigned the Klimts to the auction house Christie's, to be sold on her behalf. "Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I" sold for $135 million, and "Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer II" for $88 million, with the five paintings bringing a total of over $327 million.[3]

[edit] In media

Maria Altmann's story has been recounted in two documentary films. Adele's Wish by filmmaker Terrence Turner, who is the husband of Altman's great-niece, was released in 2008. Adele's Wish features interviews with Altmann, her lawyer, E. Randol Schoenberg, and leading experts from around the world. Altmann's story was also the subect of the documentary Stealing Klimt, which was released 2007. That movie also featured interviews with Altmann and others who were closely involved with the story.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ http://supreme.justia.com/us/541/03-13/case.html Full text of the opinion from Justia.
  2. ^ http://www.adele.at/Klage_von__Dr__Stefan_Gulner_m/Vorgelegte_Urkunden/Testament_vom_19_1_1923_von_Ad/testament_vom_19_1_1923_von_ad.html (German)
  3. ^ ^ Christopher Michaud, Christie's stages record art sale, Reuter's, November 9, 2006. Accessed November 9, 2006.

[edit] Sources

  • Hubertus Czernin. Die Fälschung: Der Fall Bloch-Bauer und das Werk Gustav Klimts. Czernin Verlag, Vienna 2006. ISBN 3-7076-0000-9

[edit] External links

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs