From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
[edit] AMS Book prize
Bill Thurston won the first AMS Book Prize on 6 January 2005, for his textbook "Three-dimensional Geometry and Topology". See [1]. Perhaps in 20 years this fact will be sufficiently notable to go in the article. But it isn't yet. Dbenbenn 03:58, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Certainly his other accomplishments dwarf winning the book prize, but the bar for inclusion is not as high as that. --C S (Talk) 11:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Some other accomplishments:
XaosBits (Sat Apr 2 23:41:24 GMT 2005)
- Book prize seems notable enough to go under Education and career, best ref is now http://www.ams.org/ams/press/book-thurston.html I've added a short paragraph.
Correct me if I'm wrong but is not Thurston's classification theorem which redirect to Nielsen-Thurston classification the same as the red link geometrization theorem mentioned in the article. --Salix alba (talk) 15:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- It's different. The geometrization theorem is a special case of the geometrization conjecture; it applies only to Haken manifolds. Since many 3-manifolds are Haken and Thurston thought that the usage of the Haken hypothesis was rather artificial, that gave him motivation to make the full geometrization conjecture.
- The Nielsen-Thurston classification is a classification of surface automorphisms. One has to know and understand this classification to prove Thurston's geometrization theorem for surface bundles over the circle. --C S (Talk) 22:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] citing sources
Would the people who created/edited this article please add source citations for the biographical info mentioned in the article, as per WP:CITE and WP:BLP? Thanks, Nsk92 18:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)