User talk:Saxifrage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Saxifrage is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives
beginning — 15 August 2005 August 2005 — 5 January 2006 January 2006 — 11 April 2006 April 2006 — 12 June 2006 June 2006 — 26 July 2006 July 2006 — 8 September 2006 September 2006 - 8 November 2006 November 2006 - May 2007

Contents 1 Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.jpg listed for deletion 2 David webber 3 Wikipita 4 Redirects for discussion 5 RfD nomination of Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia 6 GEN[M]AY 7 Judging Weight 8 Sainte-Adèle, Quebec 9 A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review

[edit] Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +mt 00:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] David webber

A tag has been placed on David webber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smashville 03:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

My apologies. Error corrected. Smashville 03:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipita

No, that's what the article talk page is for. I've left numerous notes on his talk page though. GreenJoe 15:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I left an olive branch on his talk page. GreenJoe 15:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects for discussion

Hi. A redirect you created 18 months ago, Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia, has beel listed at Redirects for discussion. Please share your thoughts about it there. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfD nomination of Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia

I have nominated Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:54, 11 July 2008 (U

[edit] GEN[M]AY

y u thro hate dood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.17.52 (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Judging Weight

Saxifrage, I found a post you made to NPoV Talk (now archived), as follows: "You misunderstand: us editors need to be able to judge what should be included long before the readers can judge what to believe. How should we do this? — Saxifrage | ☎ 23:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"

Was such a process ever addressed anywhere in WP satisfactorily?

Thanks, SteveMc (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sainte-Adèle, Quebec

Since you are the most voluminous contributor to Sainte-Adèle, Quebec, maybe you would be interested in the merger proposal now posted at the top of that article (from Saint-Adèle). Michael Hardy (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review

Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xeno^talk 15:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I left a followup q, to see if you fit in any of the categories or just want me to indent and leave your updated comment below your line item. –xeno^talk 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)