Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut: WT:RFC

NOTE: This talk page is not the place to post notices of disputes or requests for comment. Please follow Wikipedia:Requests for comment.

Are you having trouble getting your RfC listed? Please make sure the bot hasn't been turned off. If the bot hasn't run in the last few hours, then please alert the bot's owner. If the bot is apparently running, then the problem is almost certainly with the template formatting. To get help with formatting the template correctly, please leave a message, including the name of the page where you want to start the RfC, at the bottom of this page.

Archives
For why RfC was created, see Archive at WP:Resolving disputes Archive 1 Archive 2: Feb 2004–May 2005 Archive 3: May 2005–Sep 2005 Archive 4: Sep 2005–Oct 2005 Archive 5: Oct 2005–May 2006 Archive 6: May 2006–Dec 2006 Archive 7: Jan 2007–Jun 2007 Archive 8: July 2007–Dec 2007 Archive 9: Jan 2008-Feb 2009 Archive 10: Feb 2009-May 2009

Contents 1 Template not picked up by bot ? 2 User page Rfc 3 Regarding the RFC on the Osho ( Bhagwan shree Rajneesh ) movement. 4 Requesting clarification 5 Broken listing needs fixing

[edit] Template not picked up by bot ?

RfC templates added http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Teachings_of_Prem_Rawat&diff=prev&oldid=293057844 appear not to have been picked up. As there are no other RfC entries for 29th May perhaps this is a problem with the Bot rather than the formatting of the Templates. --Nik Wright2 (talk) 12:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User page Rfc

Is it normal to have an Rfc on a user page? A discussion was started at The Village Pump by Jarry1250, see here. This editor has now started an Rfc on his own user page: User:Jarry1250/RFC. Is this acceptable? Thanks for any guidance on this. --Kleinzach 03:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with it. —harej (talk) 08:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for a response at long last! Is there any information on this anywhere? Any guideline or whatever? --Kleinzach 00:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding the RFC on the Osho ( Bhagwan shree Rajneesh ) movement.

This request has been open for 6weeks and no comments have been added for 2weeks, could I please ask for an evaluation and possible closure of this request.Here is a link to the request Talk:Rajneesh_movement#RfC:_Title_for_this_page Just looking at the page, the bot has removed the tag but as yet no comment has been given.(Off2riorob (talk) 21:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC))

[edit] Requesting clarification

Hi there. I have a situation I've been trying to deal with involving an admin I feel has been abusive with his sysop privileges. However, according to the RFC rules, I can't file an RFC here until I have a second person to corroborate the issue, and at the moment it's just been between myself and the other user.

Is it permissible to ask an uninvolved admin to review the situation and, if he/she agrees that there was a problem, to have that admin join me in filing the RFC? Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello? Bueller? — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Alrighty, I'm going to assume that this talk page is dead and completely unmonitored. If anyone ever does reply to my question, please leave me a note on my talk page, because I'm no longer watching this one. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 17:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

• Responded on the talk page. II | (t - c) 17:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Broken listing needs fixing

Please could someone have a look at the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Society, sports, law, and sex listing for Talk:Unexplained disappearances? I've tried to fix the listing myself [1] but the bot has reverted me, and I don't want to make a bigger mess or appear to be trying to make some inappropriate change. Thanks. 58.8.10.170 (talk) 06:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC) - now fixed - [2] - thanks. 58.8.10.170 (talk) 14:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)